There's a lot of discussion in the blogosphere about this article in Tuesday's New York Times about students, professors, and e-mail.
At colleges and universities nationwide, e-mail has made professors much more approachable. But many say it has made them too accessible, erasing boundaries that traditionally kept students at a healthy distance.
These days, they say, students seem to view them as available around the clock, sending a steady stream of e-mail messages — from 10 a week to 10 after every class — that are too informal or downright inappropriate.
"The tone that they would take in e-mail was pretty astounding," said Michael J. Kessler, an assistant dean and a lecturer in theology at Georgetown University. " 'I need to know this and you need to tell me right now,' with a familiarity that can sometimes border on imperative."
He added: "It's a real fine balance to accommodate what they need and at the same time maintain a level of legitimacy as an instructor and someone who is institutionally authorized to make demands on them, and not the other way round."
While once professors may have expected deference, their expertise seems to have become just another service that students, as consumers, are buying. So students may have no fear of giving offense, imposing on the professor's time or even of asking a question that may reflect badly on their own judgment.
As someone who teaches seven classes here at the community college, this rang quite true to me. In a typical semester, I've got 250-300 students; I can expect to get anywhere from 10-40 e-mails a day. Some are quite polite, but others are -- as the article suggests -- remarkably demanding.
Too many of my students tend to think of their professors as being akin to a 24/7 help line. I've had more than one email, sent on a Saturday night, asking me to look over a rough draft that's due on Monday morning! I've had students complain "You don't seem to check your e-mail on weekends", as if instant replies to their countless queries were part and parcel of my job description!
Here's an angle that the Times article doesn't explore: the declining number of students who visit in conference hours. When I first started teaching full-time in 1994, relatively few of my students had access to e-mail. I had five hours of "conference time" per week, and throughout the semester, I had regular visits from a large percentage of my students. In those early years, perhaps a quarter of my students would visit me over the course of the term. They had no other reliable means of getting in touch with me; most didn't have cell phones, and as a result, had difficulty ringing me up during my office hours. They had no choice but to visit, and visit they did.
With the coming of e-mail, the number of students who take the time to visit me in office hours has dropped precipitously. In the last seven or eight years, I've seen what must be an 80-90% drop in the number of those who are willing to come and knock on my door. E-mail is not only much more convenient for the students in terms of time (they don't have to plan their schedules around my five hours of weekly availability), it's also much easier for the introverted and the shy. I know that some students are terrified of meeting one-on-one with a professor; back in the old "pre- e-mail days", I had some trembling in my office. The lack of face-to-face contact is helpful for these folks, but it's also ultimately detrimental. Success in life, I feel, involves being willing to take risks (such as those involved in going to meet with a professor in person). It's too damned easy to hide behind the e-mail and not challenge oneself to move out of a comfort zone.
I don't accept papers or rough drafts via e-mail. If a student wants feedback on a paper, they need to come to office hours and meet with me to discuss their written work. If I were teaching one or two classes, I could perhaps allow students to send their work in -- but trying to download 200-300 attachments of MS Word documents would be impossible. Besides, I give my best feedback orally -- students will benefit much more from a few minutes of spoken feedback than they will from my chicken scratching on their papers. But for that, they have to take the same sort of risks and make the same sort of effort that earlier generations of students regularly made.
The fact that so few folks come to visit me in office hours these days does give me more time to blog, or catch up on my reading or personal e-mails. At the same time, I miss the warm friendships I was able to form with some of my students "back in the day", when professor-student contact was always a face-to-face matter. I still have a few special folks who come and visit me regularly, both to discuss their work and the larger world of ideas; I enjoy the chance to mentor and connect. I couldn't do it with all of my students, time wouldn't permit that. But there's no question that e-mail has made my office hours a bit lonelier, and I think it's enabled too many of my students to hide behind their computer screens. Progress it isn't.
When I was in high school or college, I never once took advantage of a teacher or professor's visiting hours. I was always a bit mystified by those who did. Now I realize that I probably lost out.
My major stumbling block was that, to me, a professor or teacher was someone to be impressed. I couldn't imagine going to a professor and admitting to having difficulty or being perplexed by something. My entire goal if perplexed or in difficulty was to hide that fact, not advertise it!
When I did have trouble with certain classes, I didn't have the foggiest idea how I might use the professor to help me. When I struggled in one class in high school, someone suggested that I see the teacher. But I couldn't imagine seeing the teacher without having made an effort to solve my own difficulties and I assumed that if I really made an effort then I wouldn't need to see the teacher!
I think maybe colleges should have some sort of orientation as to how to effectively take advantage of access to a professor and what professors can and can't do to help their students one-on-one!
Posted by: The Happy Feminist | February 23, 2006 at 08:37 AM
I'm also one of those "scared of the prof" people. I've always been paranoid of looking incompetent in front of instructors. NOT talking to them probably has done that far more than admitting I needed help, but irrational fears are just that: irrational.
Especially now, when I'm contemplating grad school and needing recommendation letters, I've been putting off applying because I can't think of one prof I didn't say something exceedingly stupid to in class or write something stupid in a paper or otherwise made myself look like an idiot.
Of course, I rarely e-mail them either, but if I absolutely have to communicate with one of them, that's usually what I do, but it's generally a last resort and I tend to keep them short, neutral and business-like and don't get upset if I don't get a reply.
I think a lot of profs don't realize that some of the "pushyness" of their students is likely a result of nerves and the student trying to mask their own lack of confidence by being boorish. A lot of profs also forget that their students are often very keenly aware of the power they have over their academic career and possibly their future (like getting into grad school).
There are some students who are genuinely rude and disrespectful, but I don't think that's most of them.
Posted by: breadfish | February 23, 2006 at 08:51 AM
Good point about office hours. I remember in the late 90's when I was a TA. The office hour session most immediately preceeding an exam; there would be students crowding in and around the door, and I'd let them take turns asking questions, and we'd have these great impromptu review sessions where they were helping each other as much as I was helping them. That never happens anymore, and I miss it.
And for some reason I'm really unproductive during empty office hours, even for email or something.
Posted by: djw | February 23, 2006 at 09:54 AM
breadfish: I can't imagine there are too many faculty (although I'm sure they're out there) who remember students by their most foolish or confused moments. Those aren't interesting at all--we remember students in the moments they shine. It's much more memorable, and besides, undergraduates are supposed to be confused and wrong a good portion of the time. Those of us with our egos under control even remember when we were foolish, confused and wrong in class.
Posted by: djw | February 23, 2006 at 09:57 AM
As an undergraduate, I was one of those students who were too shy, most of the time, to go talk to a professor during office hours. I generally tried to figure things out on my own.
I went back to graduate school after working for a few years and after having my first child so I wasn't nearly as shy anymore. I really enjoyed the chance to have conversations with the professors and to talk to them about how to improve my papers. But, I still felt like I was taking up their time and tried to be as efficient as possible. I wish I'd spent a bit less time worrying, and more time finding out about their ideas.
Posted by: M Light | February 23, 2006 at 10:55 AM
I teach part time at a major university. One reason I am loathe to give out my e-mail address is that I get bombarded with e-mails from students wanting me to explain my they got an A- instead of an A!
So I ended up having a form reply that said I do not discuss such issues via e-mail.
Posted by: alexander | February 23, 2006 at 11:03 AM
I had the truly lucky experience of having a mentor in my last two years of college. I soaked up hours of her presence, her wit, her intelligence, and her advice -- all of which is still tangible and meaningful some 15 years later. [Props go to history prof Ellen Eslinger, now at DePaul Univ.] She still is the touchstone and inspiration for my academic pursuits.
If email had been available, I would have made an even sketchier and remote student than I already was. I would have created too many excuses and loopholes, me thinks.
Posted by: Q Grrl | February 23, 2006 at 12:27 PM
I had a couple of professors in college who required their students to visit them during office hours a few times a quarter. My screenwriting prof, for example, had us visit with him one-on-one to discuss our screenplays, and I had an honors history seminar where I was required to meet regularly with my professor to discuss my research topic.
Sadly, I pretty much never went to office hours unless I was required to, but I learned more and felt closer to the professors in the classes where it was required (and, therefore, where I went). That's just one of the things I'd do if I went back to school - take advantage of office hours regularly!
Posted by: lorie | February 23, 2006 at 02:00 PM
Surprisingly enough, I feel like it's LESS of an intrusion to email a professor. If I email them, they can respond to me on their own time, as opposed to visiting them and feeling like I'm demanding that they talk to me NOW.
And, let me say ditto to the whole "afraid of the professor thing". If there's a prof I really like, I hate to look incompetent to them. If it's a professor I hate, I'm afraid some of my body language will slip and s/he'll realize how much of a bore I find her/his class, and will reflect poorly on my grade.
Not to mention, the person to person thing intimidates me, wheras asking questions in class, I feel like her/his attention is dispursed.
Posted by: Antigone | February 24, 2006 at 09:37 AM
Honestly, after reading that article, I don't think I'd e-mail, call, visit or have any kind of contact whatsoever with some of those professors. While I can understand being frustrated when students are especially rude or when they expect extra services/special treatment from professors, some of the complaints quoted in the article seemed incredibly petty and even a little mean-spirited.
Was it really necessary to mock that poor freshman who didn't know which notebook to buy (particularly since I, at least, have been in numerous classes in which professors actually did recommend that we purchase a certain type of folder/notebook/binder for our notes and handouts)? And why is it "going too far" to contact a professor if you're concerned that he's going through the material too quickly for you to effectively grasp it? I can't tell if the message there was "these issues should be discussed face-to-face instead of in e-mail" or "you shouldn't ever dare to say anything remotely negative about a professor's teaching style"; I hope it was the former (though I don't see why that really makes a difference).
Maybe it's just that I'm looking at this from the perspective of a student (one more semester to go!) and not as someone who's actually worked as a teacher or professor, but I honestly think that some of these professors' comments reflected more negatively on themselves than on their students. They seem to have forgotten that although their students do have a responsibility to be respectful, they also have a responsibility to teach effectively, be responsive to student concerns, and ideally care about their students as individuals. Which means once in a while sucking it up and helping the confused freshman even though it's not really their responsibility, or actually listening and not taking a superior "how dare you criticize me" attitude when students suggest (respectfully and appropriately) that they may not be teaching as effectively as they could be.
(Note that none of this is intended as a criticism of Hugo, or any other professor who posts here-- just responding to the specific people quoted in the article!)
Posted by: Keri | February 24, 2006 at 11:17 AM
Interesting topic...I am a chemistry professor at a small liberal arts college, and I love email! It's a great way for students to ask questions that, frankly, they might not ask if they had to walk their way over to my office. I have very small classes, however; I might feel differently if I had huge amounts of email questions coming my way. Also, these small classes mean that I get to know my students well in class and lab. I don't feel any obligation to answer these emails immediately, or even to reply at all via email--sometimes I'll just make a note to mention a particular concept and answer the question in class. I also find email to be a great way to communicate with my class as a whole (along with course management sites like Blackboard)...such as in the event of a class cancellation, error on a problem set, etc. I've come to the realization that even though I didn't grow up with email, for most of my students, it's how they're used to communicating.
I was a bit taken aback as well with the professor in the article that seemed to think that the notebook question was somehow out-of-bounds--some classes do have specific requirements, but more than that, how long would it have taken to reply with a quick "it doesn't really matter...any kind will do" message? A lot less time, I'd bet, than it took to worry about what her response should be.
For those students who hesitate to visit or email their professors for fear of appearing dumb....AAAARRRRRGGGHHHHHH!!! That's like a knife to the chest for me! You know, it's not just the fabulously generous salary or glamorous jet-set lifestyle that draws us to a career teaching college...most of us actually like helping/talking with/arguing with/joking around with students! Really! And the few who might really think less of you for asking a question--who cares? I'm much more impressed with students who ask questions (even the occasional obvious one) than with those who never go out on that limb. And that will be reflected in recommendation letters.
So...just my $0.02.
Posted by: Louise | February 24, 2006 at 01:01 PM
In the last seven or eight years, I've seen what must be an 80-90% drop in the number of those who are willing to come and knock on my door. E-mail is not only much more convenient for the students in terms of time, it's also much easier for the introverted and the shy.
Posted by: Medic Blog | January 29, 2011 at 03:50 AM