I've come across what has to be my favorite internet "meme" ever: list Ten Views I Hold Without Evidence.
1. That a passionate evangelical faith in Jesus, the sort that sees Him as Savior of the world and of each of us as individuals, is easily reconcilable with the principal of universal salvation.
2. That wearing Paul Frank gear head-to-toe is quite acceptable teaching attire for an almost forty year-old college professor. (Secret goal: to have Paul Frank make and market a line of "Matilde the chinchilla" themed clothes, ala what he has done for "Julius the monkey.")
3. That the Democrats will reclaim majorities in both the House and Senate this fall.
4. That one could buy all of one's meals at 7-11 for a month and nonetheless remain svelte and cheerful. (Actually, I think I did accomplish this more than once when I was single.)
5. That the Cal Golden Bears will win the college football National Championship next year after an undefeated 13-0 season.
6. That the Motley Crue reunion tour, was, on the whole, a good idea and a noble contribution to Western culture.
7. That Matilde the chinchilla has a secret double life traveling the world as an angel of mercy while her guardians sleep.
8. That a consistent-life ethic that opposes all forms of violence from abortion to capital punishment to war to factory farming is consistent with liberal feminism, consistent with the needs of a growing global population, and realistically achievable within our lifetime.
9. That the ratings and comments on "Ratemyprofessors" are actually mostly written by my colleagues and other non-students.
10. That working out twelve to eighteen hours a week has nothing to do with vanity, and that schedule will be easily possible to maintain after my wife and I have children (while I meet all of my household responsibilities with enthusiasm and pleasure).
Bonus view held without evidence: That one can honestly, enthusiastically and without shame embrace the principles of Christian simplicity and humility and do so in a Hugo Boss shirt, Diesel jeans and David Yurman jewelry.
I tag everybody.
Addendum: I suppose I'd especially like to tag those out there who work in the academy. After all, the Enlightened tradition suggests that holding views without evidence is a fairly significant intellectual failing. And knowingly and cheerfully embracing irreconcilable views is anathema. So I'd like to know I'm not the only over-educated bundle of contradictions out there!
That working out twelve to eighteen hours a week has nothing to do with vanity,
Hugo, more power to you! I top out at about seven hours a week!
Posted by: alexander | January 25, 2006 at 12:02 PM
I ♥ Paul Frank!
I also believe that it is fine for a 20-year old college student to wear and own lots of Hello Kitty items. My 4-year old cousin loves Hello Kitty too--I think it must run in the family.
Posted by: sparklegirl | January 25, 2006 at 12:42 PM
I believe that I would drop some cash, right here, right now, for some Matilde apparel, and that wearing head-to-toe "Matilde, the chinchilla angel on a skateboard" would be appropriate for a grad seminar.
I'm with you on the workout thing. Every time I freak out about being able to live my triathlon lifestyle, I remind myself that there are very busy people holding demanding jobs, raising a family and training for an IM. Besides, we meed our responsibilities with enthusiasm and pleasure (at least in part) because we work out.
Posted by: Susanna Boxall | January 25, 2006 at 02:04 PM
Thanks, for the enthusiastic validation. Seriously, among many other projects we have in mind, we're thinking of creating a line of "chic chinchilla wear" ala Paul Frank. It would be hella cute.
Anyone who steals this idea, we'll expect a hefty donation to the Matilde Mission!
Posted by: Hugo | January 25, 2006 at 02:50 PM
Hugo, this is delightful! I'll do my best to come up with own list at some point. I especially like #1. :-)
Posted by: Rachel | January 25, 2006 at 03:26 PM
Oh, I'll have to blog on this one!
Posted by: Antigone | January 25, 2006 at 03:26 PM
Hey! I just wrote a post on #8.
Posted by: barb | January 25, 2006 at 06:07 PM
very interesting, hugo! i haven't seen this one floating around out there yet. i am going to bed soon, and i'll have to lay there for awhile and think about whether i actually have ten views that i hold without evidence. i mean, i practically prostrate myself at the altar of Evidence.
i'll give it a go, and see what i can come up with!
Posted by: kate.d. | January 25, 2006 at 09:00 PM
Numbers three and six: yes and hell yes.
Posted by: Lauren | January 25, 2006 at 11:35 PM
Given what you've said about your past success in picking election winners, I think #3 might be a self-defeating prophecy.
Posted by: Stentor | January 26, 2006 at 05:59 AM
Hugo,
Regarding point #1, two thoughts:
*As I asked you a while back, do you consider yourself a universalist, or a C.S. Lewis-type who holds that God will save some from other faiths whose true longing is for Christ, whether they know it or not? At the time, you told me you agreed with Lewis, but he was not a universalist. He did not believe that everyone would be granted salvation, but that God would instead allow everyone to have what they wanted in the end. Some will not want to live with Christ and in the presence of God, according to Lewis (see The Great Divorce); consequently, Lewis believed that God will not make them live in his presence. Universal salvation is something different.
*If you do hold to a universal salvation view, I think you're in the mainstream in ECUSA. (Progressive Episcopalians in VA just articulated it as one of their beliefs.) But then you have to confront the awful fact that ECUSA has excised all (I believe it's all, not just most) Scriptural references to eternal separation from God from its lectionary. Consequently, for example, the parable of the sheep and the goats stops before the reference to the fate of the goats in our lectionary; other passages could be mentioned. You also, of course, have to go against centuries of orthodox Christian belief. And such a belief is why many orthodox Anglican see ECUSA as drifting in a unitarian universalist-style direction. How do you see such a view as "easily reconcilable" with a view of Christ as savior? ("Of the whole world" in orthodox Christian belief historically has been understood to mean that anyone who wants to come in repentance and faith to Christ can come, not that everyone will come.)
Finally, I'm waiting for your thoughts on progressives and their lack of emphasis on obedience, as I wrote before the holidays.
Peace of Christ,
Chip
Posted by: Chip | January 31, 2006 at 06:07 PM
Chip, you're right that I neglected to write on progressives and obedience.
As for your lengthy query about universalism, with all respect, the title of the meme is "Ten Views I hold WITHOUT Evidence." I share here what I hope and believe, not what I can prove.
Posted by: Hugo | January 31, 2006 at 06:24 PM
Whose Paul Frank?....Shows you what I know about men's fashion.
Posted by: jaime | January 31, 2006 at 06:33 PM
and that schedule will be easily possible to maintain after my wife and I have children (while I meet all of my household responsibilities with enthusiasm and pleasure).
BWWAAA....hahahahaha!!!
Do yourself a favor....stock up on some home exercise equipment before the birth. Despite your best efforts, you won't be making it either to the gym or on long runs. Fuggetaboutit. You'll have to make do with...ummm..."interval training" at home. Sounds like you've already got the "get up early" part down pat, though! That'll serve you well!
Posted by: La Lubu | January 31, 2006 at 06:46 PM