« Hurrah for Antonio | Main | Thursday Short Poem: Justice's Men at Forty »

May 18, 2005

Comments

Tish G

Wonderful response to Kate, Hugo.

One thing that is often overlooked with young women is a tendancy to overstate their emotional maturity. It often *appears* to young women such as Kate that they are more mature--and there are many reasons for that, including good or very bad parenting, early physical maturity, and the like.

But, psychologically, we mature at certain rates (I believe it was Eric Ericson (sp?) that detailed it quite succinctly) and while there is a bit of wiggle room on either side of the scale, I don't think many of us are prodigies of emotional maturity that could adequately justify a man in his 30's or late 20's dating someone 17.

Be that as it may, Kate, in general, is in an extremely awkward period in her life where boys look like fools and men look better but probably aren't. There are, though the guys in between whom she probably has not come in contact with because she is not in their social group. And, as you noted, that will probably come in college (where many things change and many people discover they weren't as mature as they thought).

The role of older men to teen girls is often as guides and mentors. As young women gain in maturity and into their 20's (and I'm talking past 21) the relationship can shift, but is, in many instances, still a minefield. Male midlife crisis can be the cause in that instance more than female immaturity :-)

ms. b

I don't think many of us are prodigies of emotional maturity that could adequately justify a man in his 30's or late 20's dating someone 17

This is where I differed from Hugo in the original posting, and it's something I still firmly feel now; despite my own two-year relationship with a man nearly ten years older than me having broken down in the meantime, (I'm 18, he's 27) I haven't stopped believing that some young women are emotionally mature enough to handle, and gain from, relationships with older men. The worst relationships I've had in terms of emotional problems have been with guys nearer to my own age, and although I'm now dating someone slightly younger than me, it is rare I find people I can connect with within my peer group.

I guess I'm a Kate, but the issue of being a minor was never a problem, what with the age of consent being 16 here in the UK, and my parents being quite accepting of my taste in older men as normal.

Emily H.

It is very hard to spend half an hour in a high school cafeteria and not feel as if you're the most mature person there. As a teenager I always thought myself extremely mature (but with no interest in older men--I was basically asexual) but came to realize two things as I actually did become mature. First of all, that mature for a 17-year-old isn't really very mature in the grand scheme of things. Second of all, that I see my own rich and complex interior life and the superficial exterior lives of everyone else NOT because I'm more mature than other people, but because I'm not a telepath and can't see what lies below the surface in the people cursing at each other in the lunch line.

If I can think, "My God, I was such an IDIOT a few years ago!", and I usually can, I have no reason to believe the same won't be true in retrospect a few years from now.

Hugo

Thanks, all. Ms. B., you are one of the reasons I amended my stance to recognize that in some instances, the relationships such as your previous one can be healthy for all involved. But that doesn't vitiate the general warnings...

Jeff

One thing that is often overlooked with young women is a tendancy to overstate their emotional maturity. It often *appears* to young women such as Kate that they are more mature--and there are many reasons for that, including good or very bad parenting, early physical maturity, and the like.

I think gender roles play a part in this as well - boys are encouraged to act in ways we more readily recognize as immature. (There's also the fact that gaining the attention of older men often gets interpreted as "maturity.")

Caitriona

Jeff,

It seems that often, young people in general are encouraged to act with much less maturity than was acceptable in the past. Then suddenly, they are out on their own without guidelines and without the foundational experience to help them make their way.

Amanda

One thing that is often overlooked with young women is a tendancy to overstate their emotional maturity. It often *appears* to young women such as Kate that they are more mature--and there are many reasons for that, including good or very bad parenting, early physical maturity, and the like.

One signal that this is the case is when young women who date older men don't show any signa that they have carefully considered that most men who date much younger women have very bad intentions.

dave paisley

Well said Hugh, and commenters (esp. Emily). "Kate" doesn't come across in writing as mature as she thinks she is, and I think it's important to see that. Whining about how mature one is is a distinct contra-indication.

Just to throw in an observation about the differences between the UK and the US (having grown up in the former and worked with youth for 20 years in the latter) - in the UK, high school ends for the majority at age 16 and so the transition to "normal" life begins a bit sooner.

In the US, not only are all high school students required to stay until 18, but the environment is more intensely isolated from society in general (for example, the US school buses and varsity sports, etc.), which I'm sure leads to frustration for those who outgrow it early. (Fortunately, alternative schools and running start programs have helped many teens I know.)

I'm sure Kate will find her frustrations greatly eased when she gets out of the high school fishbowl and goes off to college.

Amanda

Also, the age gap is not so much the problem I have with these situations as the fact that it's a teenager and a man that has been through the process of becoming an adult. Like I tell my boyfriend, had we met when I was 18 and he 23, it wouldn't have worked. But as we met when I had become a full, job-having, rent-paying adult, the age difference is slight and meaningless.

cija

On the one hand, of course 'Kate' needs to figure out that every seventeen-year-old in the history of the world has believed she is special and different and mature and alone in a lonely world, and most of their mothers will agree that they are special and unique snowflakes (good god, does she expect her mother to explain to her that she's just like ever other teenager? It's the rare mother who'll do that.) Refusing to face your own ordinariness is the surest sign of immaturity I know.

The second surest sign of immaturity is the inability to come to terms with the necessity of waiting for things. Yeah, high school is hell - when you're fourteen and the future stretches out interminably before you. But she's seventeen; one more year and she never has to see or speak to any of those people ever again: that's real freedom, the kind you can't get from fucking a thirty-year-old.

On the other hand, there's no better way in the world to get rid of the older man mystique (the daddy complex, the queen bee syndrome - whatever your personal thing may be) - than by dating one. It won't kill you, it won't last too long, and you'll come out of it sadder, but wiser. But it'll kill your fantasies dead, and it sounds like 'Kate' gets a lot of pleasure out of hers - more than she'll get, I all but guarantee, out of dating some desperate flatterer who adores 'maturity' in teenagers but for some strange reason finds it less appealing in thirty-somethings.

Go ahead and indulge yourself if you must, Kate, but whatever else you do with the older men, don't take them too seriously. You'll be using them for your own personal growth and self-esteem, but they can handle it, and don't let them guilt you into believing otherwise. (And try to consider how it is that they're able to see the maturity and depth in a seventeen-year old while you, so mature, so wise, haven't figured out how to do that yourself with your male peers.)

Teri

Hugo,
This is exactly the type of response I expected from you. You are very predictable!

Joel

Girls like Kate are obviously a fairly uncommon breed of highschool girl.

Most of the girls I come into contact with from class to class care more about their prom plans or perhaps the newest pop star. While this is widely generalized about highschool girls, sadly it's also the norm.

I think the fact that "kate" is thoughtful of her feelings towards older men, and her awarness that such feelings deserve thought, illustrates her maturity above those of her peers.

But I have to agree though, she probably still does have a lot of growing up to do, despite her above average maturity now.

For now at least, I think Kate should stay with the friends who love her. While these pals of hers might not understand everything that's going on inside that crazy little head of hers, they appreciate her largely *because* of her individuality.

Especially the asian friends.
"Kate", I love you.

Hugo

Let's be clear, folks, if you think you "know" who "Kate" is, you don't. You may know someone like her, however.

Mark

Let's be clear, folks, if you think you "know" who "Kate" is, you don't.

And you know this, how, Hugoboy?

Amanda Marcotte

On the other hand, there's no better way in the world to get rid of the older man mystique (the daddy complex, the queen bee syndrome - whatever your personal thing may be) - than by dating one. It won't kill you, it won't last too long, and you'll come out of it sadder, but wiser. But it'll kill your fantasies dead, and it sounds like 'Kate' gets a lot of pleasure out of hers - more than she'll get, I all but guarantee, out of dating some desperate flatterer who adores 'maturity' in teenagers but for some strange reason finds it less appealing in thirty-somethings.

*clap clap* Fantastic comment--right to the heart of the matter. The guy who seems amazingly mature when you're 18 could very well look like a loser who couldn't handle grown women when you're looking back from 30.

Marianne

For what it's worth, also, Kate may find men her own age who are (or at least comfortably seem to be, which can be more important) much more mature than the average teenage boy. When I was in high school, I dated a fellow teenager who, though younger than I, was very adult in his likes/dislikes/communication patterns/ways of treating a lover/etc. More so than any of my age mates in college, more so than my very lovable and quite grown-up-where-it-counts husband, for that matter.

So she can get that safe, adult male, psychologically-restorative experience without having to date people who are *chronologically* so much older... of course, I don't happen to have a problem with May-December relationships, in either direction, anyway.

Just saying that not every teenage boy is really such a boy as all that.

Keri

Hugo, I'm obviously biased, but I think your revised stance on this issue is far more reasonable and fair than your old one. I was bothered by your original dismissal of the differences between a teacher-student relationship and a relationship between two people of different ages who meet on neutral ground, and I'm glad that you're now acknowledging them. I do agree that it's necessary to approach these situations carefully, and in many cases they have the potential to be unhealthy and harmful, but thank you for allowing for the exceptions to the rule.

I guess I was one of the Kates of the world several years ago, particularly in terms of peer relationships. In my case, it wasn't entirely "maturity" that was the issue (though that was a factor), but the fact that I had (and still have) next to nothing in common with most of my peers. I couldn't care less what happened on The O.C. last night, I don't follow sports, and getting drunk just for the sake of getting drunk isn't really my idea of a good time-- that eliminates most of the people I come in contact with on a regular basis right there. Even the people I relate to well enough to be friends with haven't heard of or don't like half of the hobbies/music/movies/books/etc. I'm into. When I finally found someone who had enough in common with me to share in my life and activities to the extent that I really needed in a partner, he happened to be eight years older than me (and I was 18, so the law wasn't an issue). It's worked out beautifully so far, and I understand that part of the reason for that is that both of us were and are somewhat atypical among our age groups; our lifestyles and plans for the future were more in synch than the stereotypical "teenage girl who lives in a college dorm and wants to go to parties and date casually"/"twenty-something man who has an established career and wants to settle down and have kids." I could understand how a relationship with the same age gap might be a disaster between personalities like that, but if we could be an exception to the rule, so could others.

In any case, I'm a bit annoyed at the implication that any young woman who can't connect with a man her age just isn't trying hard enough. Believe me, I tried. (And the comment about men who date younger women "finding maturity in thirty-somethings less appealing" is quite a misunderstanding of all but the sleaziest of these relationships, I think. Perhaps if maturity was the only thing one looks for in a partner, that might be accurate, but it certainly isn't. Don't you think it's possible that, given a younger woman and an older woman who are both sufficiently mature, the younger woman might be more appealing to a particular man than the older for reasons unrelated to her age? As Hugo pointed out, individuals cannot be reduced to numbers, and not all relationships with age differences have the age difference as the sole or main basis of the relationship-- a lot of people get together with younger/older partners not because of the potential power imbalance, but because they're honestly attracted to and compatible with someone who happens to be younger/older. These healthy relationships just don't get as much press, because there's less reason to call attention to the age difference if it isn't causing problems.)

Sarah Dylan Breuer

Not that there's any such thing, but I'm not an objective observer. I worry about my peers in their thirties who date men in the fifties or older. If a man can't manage to grow up in thirty or forty years, why should anyone expect that he would in fifty? Among adolescents, my experience as a youth minister reinforces what we all hear: that young women of eleven or twelve or thirteen are capable of much more maturity than boys the same age. But at some point, guys, it's time to grow up ... and my subjective impression of men of fifty or older who date women in their early thirties or younger is that the men are dating the younger women more to prove that they (the men) are still "young" -- i.e., that they can still attract women who are more physically attractive than they are, and that their male friends will envy -- than because the partnership is really in any way equal.

Age different doesn't automatically mean that a relationship is awful, but I'd say that a man of fifty who can't find a partner he loves who's anywhere near his age is proclaiming his own immaturity. And meeting a partner through church is hardly a guarantee that it's spiritual priorities that are primary in the relationship. I know far too many people of all sexes and sexualities who have used churches as "meet/meat markets" to think otherwise.

Blessings,

Dylan

Tish G

Don't you think it's possible that, given a younger woman and an older woman who are both sufficiently mature, the younger woman might be more appealing to a particular man than the older for reasons unrelated to her age?

Usually, the difference is a more nubile, fit body.

Men are visual, and sometimes the visual wins out over the chronological or the psychological (as I've noticed dating over the age of 40)

Also, people (because this applies to men and women)sometimes have trouble being around others their own age because of a mortality thing or a social thing. Someone younger keeps him/her feeling younger, or is in the same social circle and an easier fit than someone the same age. Someone around the same age could also be a reminder of one's mortality.

But another prejudice that is often used by individuals who choose to date younger people is the assumption that the younger person has "no baggage" and will be "less complicated." Which, when you think about it is rather silly. The baggage may be a bit lighter and the complications more commonplace, but everybody has baggage and nobody's *that* simple.

Keri

Tish, I think you missed the reasons unrelated to her age part of my comment. I was referring to traits like common interests, a similar worldview, sense of humor, intelligence, kindness-- traits that can exist independent of age and in which a particular younger woman could easily have an advantage over a particular older woman (or vice versa, for that matter, but the implication seemed to be that a younger woman couldn't possibly have anything to offer an older man in a relationship other than ease of manipulation, so that's what I was trying to refute).

I think the "men are visual" thing is largely a myth, perpetuated by the socialization which encourages men and discourages women from expressing visual attraction (and the men who use it to justify shallow and dehumanizing behavior don't help either). And your association of "young" with "nubile and fit" is downright laughable to me, seeing as there are probably countless women in their late twenties or thirties who are far more "nubile and fit" than I am. Obviously any older man who would be interested in me must have other priorities.

Hugo

Keri, you were one of the many people who took me to task after my first post. I didn't agree with all your criticisms, but I heard you and your experience -- and when I got Kate's email, what you had said in the past factored into my response.

Dylan, you're right -- churches are no guarantee of healthy relationships!

mythago

Someone younger keeps him/her feeling younger

I've heard this referred to as "bathing in the blood of virgins"...

As Hugo says, we have to let younger women make their own choices, and sometimes they are right in those choices. But, as others have pointed out, the age gap looks way different from the older side.

Tish G

Keri...

I was being slightly facetious with the nubile body comment. should have done this ;-)

"Nubile" can also mean "youthful." There is a great difference between the youthfulness of a teen-age body and the youthfulness of a 20-something body.

be that as it may, I tend to disagree with your supposition that the "men are visual" thing is largely a myth. There have been many studies that show this to be true. As there have been studies that show that women also have a visual componenet to attraction, but it functions differently than it does in men, and is often not the primary factor in attraction (strangely, scent seems to th more important attraction factor for women than men--there have been studies to this effect).

Also, consider the difficulties many "fat" women have in dating....and how many magazines constantly focus on how women should lose weight to be more "attractive." It isn't nec. to sell diet programs, as this piece of advice has been around since the days of the Gibson Girl.

Since I don't know you, Keri, I can't really comment on why an older man might be attracted to you....or the type and kind of older man who is attracted to you.

And, too, depends on the barometer of "older".

Often, people want to think that biology, or "hard wiring" has absolutely nothing to do with how we behave and the decisions we make regarding attraction. It seems to be a huge faux pas in many liberal cicles to say so. Which I do not understand. Biology is a component of attraction, whether we want to believe it or not. In re-reading "The Road Less Travelled," a highly-touted piece of popular on love and relationship psychology, there is a very cogent discussion on how biology as much as psychology tricks us into thinking we are "in love." Seeing how love has played out in my own life, and in the lives of friends over the past 25 years, I can see that there is great truth to this, as the reasons and motives for "falling in love" change as one gets older.

Mr. Bad

Keri said: Tish, I think you missed the reasons unrelated to her age part of my comment. I was referring to traits like common interests, a similar worldview, sense of humor, intelligence, kindness-- traits that can exist independent of age and in which a particular younger woman could easily have an advantage over a particular older woman (or vice versa, for that matter, but the implication seemed to be that a younger woman couldn't possibly have anything to offer an older man in a relationship other than ease of manipulation, so that's what I was trying to refute).

Keri, I mostly agree with you take on this issue but just want to point out that even the traits you list above are influenced by age and life experience. While they may not be as directly linked as skin tone, etc., they certainly develop and mature over time.

I also think that biology plays an important role, and like Tish, have read the studies that support a prominent biological role in romantic attraction. Try as we might to ignore her, Mother Nature is a powerful force in our lives. Therefore, I see it as quite natural for older men to be attracted to and seek out younger, more fertile females. Toss in the reality that younger women are not as likely to be as jaded and cynical about men as their older counterparts are, in turn making them more pleasant to be around and spend time with, and IMO older men persuing younger women becomes a no-brainer. And finally, relating to this, I categorically reject the steretoype thrown about by some here that all such men are lechers and exploiters. Perhaps they just want to spend time with someone who treats them kindly, and who doesn't view them with suspicion and as some kind of potential adversary. I've heard this sentiment from other men quite often when discussing male/female relationships.

Jeff

One thing I've noticed is that large age gaps in relationships tend to be more common within smaller "subcultures" (loosely defined as anything that people use for group identification - religions, lifestyle choices, activities, etc.). I think this is probably for two reasons - first, if membership in a subculture is an important criteria for choosing a partner, as it often is, then the range of potential matches is restricted, and the likelihood that someone compatible will be found within a narrow age range is less. Second, many of these "subcultures" afford people of different ages the opportunity to interact as peers, something that's rare in the general culture (where the only interactions one tends to have with people of differing ages involve power dynamics - teacher/student, boss/employee, guardian/ward, etc.).

I'm not saying there aren't ever problematic relationships in these subcultures, but I'm be more inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to the couples I know with age differences who met this way.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Regular reads

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 01/2004