I'm sitting alone in my office, surrounded by student papers. And once again, I'm catching plagiarizers. Two so far today. Both caught using Google. Both students in classes where I made it clear what plagiarism is. It's quite depressing, actually.
When plagiarism is blatant (as it was in these instances), I give automatic F grades. Rarely do the students challenge the grade -- on the occasions that they do, I simply take them to the web page from which they plagiarized. That tends to do the trick. On some occasions, they become sullen; on others, they start to beg for a second chance. I tell them they are welcome to repeat the class, but the F stands.
Asian students are more likely to plagiarize than white students; males are more likely to plagiarize than females. Plagiarism occurs less often in my gender studies classes and more often in my Western Civ courses. These are generalities, but no course or ethnic group is immune, it seems. And while it is dispiriting, there is almost something fun about catching a blatant example of academic dishonesty! I confess that on certain occasions, writing in a well-earned F next to a student's name gives me a certain pleasure. It's not akin to the joy that comes from giving a hard-working student a well-deserved A -- but it's close!
May I ask if what you find is usually a case of uncited research, or more of the bulk of the idea within the paper?
Posted by: susan | December 17, 2004 at 01:22 PM
It's usually entire chunks of uncited research; if they were only stealing ideas and rephrasing them, I could almost live with that. Mostly, it's stuff that is taken verbatim off various websites.
Posted by: Hugo | December 17, 2004 at 01:25 PM
That's been my experience of plagiarism on papers I've graded as well...entire chunks!?
Posted by: Christopher | December 17, 2004 at 05:58 PM
I've had students continue to challenge my verdict even AFTER I showed them the webpage.... coincidence, he said. A paragraph's worth of coincidence.....
I'm about to dive into my world history final essays, and I'm probably going to be googling for a while, too.
Posted by: Jonathan Dresner | December 17, 2004 at 07:19 PM
I've never really understood plagiarism... stupid, stupid, stupid. And insulting to the teacher, I'd think...as if "entire chunks" *wouldn't* jump off the page at anyone with half an eye for writing?
This isn't to say that I've always read every single chapter of assigned stuff, or always absolutely thoroughly researched everything to the best of my ability...but, IMO, when in a bind, the best solution is to glean as much info as you can and and then b.s. really well...that way, at least it's *your* b.s. and not someone else's. (not that I've ever done that for one of Hugo's papers, of course...)
Posted by: Miranda | December 18, 2004 at 12:55 PM
That's why I don't understand why they do it. To show an instructor that you've bothered to look up and find the material, it behooves the student to cite it (the more citations the better!) Then you can expand upon the idea with another sentence or short paragraph to agree or refute, or, a little eloquent b.s.
Posted by: susan | December 18, 2004 at 02:29 PM
Upon first reading, your post invoked vivid memories of last fall when I caught my inaugural round of plagiarized papers. I felt disappointed and insulted. When I indignantly reported the blatant acts of acadmic dishoneesty (whole unattributed sentences, sometimes pages!) to the political science department at Berkeley, they told me that usually nothing happens to these students! Apparently most professors don't want to hassle with filing a claim so serial plagiarists get away with it semseter after semester. I failed each of the students but the professor under whom I was working did not want to press it any further.
Tonight I caught my first plagiarist of the current semester. Like you, I'm a bit embarrassed to admit that I felt a certain joy when I caught the deception. My joy fluttered wider when I discovered the depth of the dishonesty. With a little googling, I discovered more than twenty plagiarized quotes within a nine page paper.
While admittedly I do feel some smug sense of victory, mostly I continue to feel disappointed and insulted. These students are not only disrespecting my knowledge of the available literature and ability to discern one writing style from another, but they are disgracing the university. I have immense pride in this institution and feel offended and angry when students cast shame upon it by plagiarizing. I might be even angrier with the university for ignoring this rampant problem. Berkeley and other academic institutions must stand up to this dispicable problem.
P.S. If a student plagiarized like this at Scripps College when I attended there as an undergrad, they would have been sitting on top of their suitcases in the Dean of Students office within hours of discovery. This simply was not tolerated in Claremont. There is no excuse for it at elsewhere.
Posted by: Catherine Hazelton | December 20, 2004 at 12:25 AM